In the book there are two immortal humans, while the rest
of humanity is its regular dying self. A man has lived for over 3,000 years. He
has done so because he has the ability to move from body to body. When he moves
into a body the original owner is killed. The bodies he leaves behind fall to
ground, meeting their physical end. A woman has lived for over 300 years. She
has the ability to see into her own cells and manipulate them. Thus she can
heal all wounds, cure all sickness, and keep her body young.
The woman is a classic “gatherer.” Even though she
outlives all of her progeny she prefers to be near family, and continues to
hold emotional attachments to all of her decedents. The man has essentially lost touch with his
humanity. He is as unfeeling towards humans as we are to insects. At most he
sees humans as a commodity (the book makes many references to humans as
livestock). If the woman were to live for thousands of years would she too lose
empathy towards other humans?
The idea is put forth that the man has lost his humanity
because of loneliness. He has long ago lost any emotional connection. The
remedy is for him to accept the woman as some sort of companion, and to not
kill her as he would eventually do. He can become human again because of
emotional connection through companionship.
It got me thinking about the power of loneliness, and the
motivation to avoid loneliness. How often is our behavior dictated by our
loneliness? How often do we force, or settle for, a relationship in order to
avoid being alone? How often do we accept undesirable situations in a
relationships so as not to lose that relationship? How often do we seek out
casual sex to get a temporary feeling of acceptance?
If you are unable, or unwilling, to be alone then are you
leading an emotionally healthy life? Conversely, what if you have accepted
being alone to the point where you are unable, or unwilling, to begin relationships?
As usual, the answer lies in-between. Moderation. Balance.
No comments:
Post a Comment